Jeremy Truitt

An attempt to understand the world of current events, finance and the economy on a level that allows me to teach it. I'm a journalist. Oh and the occasional post about family, life and kids!

Unemployment Rate Drops From 8.3% to 8.1%, And That’s Terrible News

 

Photo courtesy of Reuters

Unemployment rate. Jobless claims. Long-term unemployed. These are admittedly confusing words we all hear thrown around the media frequently. I’m going to break this down with a very simplistic explanation of WHAT THE HELL IT MEANS, so maybe we can all sound smarter to our friends.

To begin, the national unemployment rate is calculated every month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, or BLS. In a “healthy” economy (which is subjective, I understand), the natural unemployment rate should not be higher than the low-to-mid 6 percentile. Theoretically, a 0% unemployment rate is not attainable due to natural seasonal factors and the reality of Frictional Unemployment, which is simply the time spent between one job and another; the “job-searching” period.

So how could it be so terrible that the rate dropped 2/10 of a percent? Lower unemployment is good right?! Well not necessarily. The key lies in how the BLS compiles the data. Here’s the breakdown:

There are roughly 300 million people in America. Out of those 300 million, the BLS subtracts those who can’t work, those who are too old to work, and those who ARE NOT LOOKING for work. BINGO!!! Here’s the magic key! That’s right, if you’re an able-bodied American and simply don’t want to work and are not looking, you DO NOT get counted in the unemployment rate.

When we subtract those people, we have only about 154 million individuals whom the BLS counts as IN THE LABOR FORCE. In other words, there are only 154 million people in the U.S. available to work, so that’s the number they use to calculate the unemployment rate.

Next is also fairly simple. They look at how many people don’t have a job. The number as of now is roughly 12 million people. They simply divide the number of unemployed (12 million) into the labor force (154 million) and there ya’ have it!

But again, why would the unemployment rate decreasing be a bad thing? Think about it. Use your deductive reasoning skills.

Here’s the answer: From July to August, more people STOPPED looking for work, which effectively removes them from the “unemployed” category, which in-turn lowers the unemployment rate. The hard number is this: 368,000. That’s correct, in one month, 368,000 Americans just stopped looking for work, which lowered the unemployment rate to 8.1%.

That is why the decrease is NOT always a good thing. Further, the labor force participation rate, which is the amount of individuals in the labor force divided by the total population is at 63%, which is the lowest point in 31 years. As a fun fact, the real unemployment is 13.7%.

Here’s a phenomenal video from CNN that also helps explain the concepts: Money.CNN.com

Stay involved. Read, learn and grow. Be brilliant.

Hope that helps.

 

Advertisements

6 comments on “Unemployment Rate Drops From 8.3% to 8.1%, And That’s Terrible News

  1. bravesmartbold
    September 17, 2012

    Really informative. I understand it a little better now. Your blog makes more sense to me than some articles in the paper. I’ll be reading.

    • Jeremy Truitt
      September 17, 2012

      Thanks! I always get frustrated when these TV pundits talk fast and detailed and the average person can’t really grasp the meaning. My goal is to break down these crazy terms and ideals into easily digestible pieces of info. Thanks for reading!

  2. broadsideblog
    September 22, 2012

    My book “Malled” is all about these “jobs” in retail. A job, as you and NELP point out, must sustain the person doing it. No job paying $7-10 hour, when gas is $4+/gallon, is going to sustain even the most frugal single person, even with no dependents. One of my co-workers, 32, was pulling in a big fat $13/hr and had to share an apartment in a really bad neighborhood to survive. She, at least, had no kids or student debt to service.

    The problem, as I see it, is persistent corporate greed…corporations are raking in record profits and CEOs taking home enormous salaries but refuse to hire because they’re “nervous.” Please. This is not a problem that government can solve — but it is one that the private sector refuses to address. So, we’re stuck.

    • Jeremy Truitt
      September 22, 2012

      Agreed. You make a very compelling point and one would think it’s basic economics. Thanks for the reply!

  3. wolfthought
    September 22, 2012

    APPLAUSE ! ! ! ! Most people also do not factor in Welfare Recipients, People living off of savings or forced to move in with family or friends and a lot of other critical factors. Not to mention those people still looking that hae already slid out the back door of the U.E. system. If one pasues for a moment and considers all the factors involved . . 13.7% is probably conservative Extremely conservative. None of it addresses “under emloyed” either. People working, but not earning enough to support a louse on a mouse.

    • Jeremy Truitt
      September 22, 2012

      I agree, thanks for the reply! 13.7% could definitely be a conservative number, i’ve actually seem statistics closer to 25% but of course those can’t be confirmed.

C'mon I KNOW you have an opinion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on September 7, 2012 by in Finance, News, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: